|
Home > Archive > CCNP > April 2003 > want BCMSN 640-604 question
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
want BCMSN 640-604 question
|
|
| mhd_fmq 2003-04-21, 9:23 am |
| hello
i going to take the BCMSN 640-604 exam
next week , so anyone has question for that exam please send it to me ,, to this forums or to my email mhd_fmq@hotmail.com
thank you , w | |
| anchor40 2003-04-21, 9:49 am |
| Now, now, getting angry is not the best way to get help from this crew! 
We can't give you the questions, or we violate the Non-Disclosure Agreement with Cisco (anyone who has taken any Cisco test has accepted the terms), undermine the hard work we put into passing those tests, AND deflate the value of our certifications. None of us want that.
However, many of us have posted general guidelines on what to study after we've taken the exams.
Search back 30-45 days and you'll find lots of posts for the Switching exam.
 | |
| kris108 2003-04-21, 3:20 pm |
| Just purchase some questions from all the spam we get from signing up on this website.
There are many deals that offer you hundreds of questions and multiple-choice answers. They arent directly from the test but I can tell you that they're very challenging and fun (if you're sadistic, get Boson tests). | |
| anchor40 2003-04-21, 3:40 pm |
| How true are both the spam and the Boson points!!! 
I found a couple of errors on Bosn's demo versions and opted not to purchase, but if you want "Cisco-style" wicked questions, that be the way to go!
 | |
| kris108 2003-04-21, 4:52 pm |
| Funny you should mention that.. I also *thought* I found an error. It was a question about what route would be chosen to get to a certain destination.. there were OSPF, EIGRP and RIP routes. The RIP route was the "longest" match, however, it had a /27 or something. And we all pretty much know how RIP handles VLSM, right?
Well, the guy responded to my email and said that I should have *assumed* it was RIP v2 if the /27 route even showed up in the routing table. Haha. Maybe, BUT, knowing all the trick questions they have in their tests, this could easily have been one trying to catch you only looking at the length of the subnet rather than the protocol advertising.
I guess I just found the question to be slightly unstable. Hopefully there isnt crap like that on the real test. | |
| anchor40 2003-04-21, 4:54 pm |
| There probably will be, but they won't assume anything, just put that stuff out there to try and trip you up!
 | |
| kris108 2003-04-21, 5:47 pm |
| Here's a good Boson question:
Assume two OSPF routers are operational on the same thernet and can ping each other. Which of the following would prevent them from establishing an adjacency?
A) The routers disagree on the DR for the network.
B) One router is configured for route summarization but the other is not.
C) One router is Cisco and the other is non-Cisco.
D) The router interfaces on the common ethernet are configured to be in different areas.
E) The routers are not configured with the same mask for their common network.
F) The routers are configured with different router dead intervals.
You're supposed to choose 3 of them. I wont tell you what I chose, but their answer is D, E and F.
D and F, sure. But E? The first line of the question says they're pingable. Perhaps they mean the "network x.x.x.x x.x.x.x area x" command is configured incorrectly?
OK enough from me on this thread, which was about 640-604.  | |
| cloudd 2003-04-22, 9:38 am |
| Quote :
......
There are many deals that offer you hundreds of questions and multiple-choice answers. They arent directly from the test but I can tell you that they're very challenging and fun (if you're sadistic, get Boson tests).
Just a question:
Why do you say 'if you're sadistic, get Boson tests?)
I have never purchased it, so i don't know why you called it 'sadistic' | |
| moiopinion 2003-04-23, 5:13 am |
| I don't want to speak for Kris. But here is my opinion about Boson...
After you've studied for the exam and think you know your stuff, taking the Boson test *could* make you fell nervous about how much you really know. Now there are two ways to look at it. The one way to look at it is, which I prefer, Boson brings out the nuances and the possibilities of real life complex scenarios.
My recommendation is to give yourself enough time to score 100% on Boson tests. It will give you a lot of confidence going in to take the exam. A friend of mine paid for the BCMSN test designed by Jason@Boson (there are three BCMSN tests that Boson offers, and one of these is designed by Jason). The test is devilish, yet in many ways useful.
Disclaimer: Yes there might be a few, and I mean very few, bugs in questions. But if you're in doubt, you can always write to them and seek clarification.
Good luck! | |
|
| quote: Originally posted by kris108
OK enough from me on this thread, which was about 640-604.
Nobody ever worries about that!!
I would have gone DEF, look at this link:
http://makeashorterlink.com/?W1F125F44
You could have scenario's where masks are different but pings are still possible, have a play with it, try 192.168.1.1/24 and 192.168.1.2/30 on an ethernet segment - they should be pingable, remember when pinging the hosts don't know what subnet mask the other other host is configured with and both addresses are valid with both masks. If the second host had been 192.168.1.4/30 then that would have been a different matter.
I always found Boson good, though one pointer I ALWAYS follow is never trust what anybody tells me until I have proved it practically - even CCO contradicts itself.
I guess you should start another thread though if you want to carry this on!  | |
| anchor40 2003-04-23, 8:23 am |
| Isn't this like a conversation at a party? You start on one topic and then migrate through several others until you wind up discussing something that has absolutely no relevance on what the conversation started with?!?! 
It's almost a challenge, now to keep this one going, winding through various topics, and only WE how "subscribe" to this thread know what the "real" current subject is!
As if we didn't have enough to do! Ha!
 | |
| Mat P 2003-04-23, 10:56 am |
| Why does everybody end up in the kitchen at a party???
At least it got the thread off the braindump question!! | |
| anchor40 2003-04-23, 11:08 am |
| It's where the food is, man!!! LOL!!!
 | |
| peterd 2003-04-25, 2:51 am |
| Hi guys,
and if you hang around the food or drinks area, eventually everyone in the room will come along and you get a chance to chat with them...
Regards
Peter | |
| anchor40 2003-04-25, 8:40 am |
| Especially if they're serving those mini sausages or meatballs on toothpicks! Very popular down here in Texas, and guaranteed to get people coming back to the food table!
 |
|
|
|
|