|
|
| ciscogirl 2003-03-01, 6:26 pm |
| Try as I might I cannot locate the is-is material on the Cisco site. Since I am scheduled to take the routing test next week I need some help. The links posted earlier didn't work .... Thanks | |
|
|
| ciscogirl 2003-03-01, 10:19 pm |
| Thanks - appreciate the help! | |
| necrophantasm 2003-03-04, 3:14 am |
| Ciscogirl,
Good luck on your exam. After you are done, please let us know if IS-IS is a major topic on the new exam, or if it is only a few questions. I have a few routing exam books, but none are the new version and I have been wondering if they will be sufficient to pass the exam successfully.
Thanks! | |
| anthonyb 2003-03-07, 12:46 pm |
| When I took the exam there were only 5 or 6 questions I had on IS-IS and they were covered with Transcender and other preparation materials. Don't concentrate too much on IS-IS. There were a lot of OSPF questions though and IGRP/EIGRP. | |
| Carl_Docklands 2003-03-10, 8:15 am |
| After taking the exam,i would disagree with that. Make sure you know is-is as well as the others. | |
| anchor40 2003-03-12, 8:31 am |
| I second Carl's point of view. This past Saturday, I had at about 10-12 IS-IS questions, including one making sure you knew it's a link-state, not distance vector.
The above CiscoPress addendum is pretty good. If you can answer the written questions included within the document, you'll probably do ok.
Remember, Cisco IS-IS doesn't support level 3 routing (domain-domain)!
Good luck! | |
| anthonyb 2003-03-12, 5:48 pm |
| The test I took was just before Christmas so it might have been a little different. I remember only having a few questions on the test though. It is probably due to the new book that came out, requiring you to know a little more about the IS-IS protocol. | |
| SureshHomepage 2003-03-15, 2:29 am |
| The best book for the new BSCI 640-901 exam is the ciscopress one by Catherine Paquet & Deane Teare. Make best use of the the new addendum on IS-IS which is available free for download at ciscopress.com site as someone mentioned above. |
|
|
|