Home > Archive > CCNP > June 2002 > qod for 6/18





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author qod for 6/18
marathoner

2002-06-18, 9:53 am

Wrong thinking in the explanation of full-duplex. It asks an easy question "which of the following are true about full duplex" and the answers given seem correct, but then the explanation says "less, if any, collisions." implying that they might still happen but much less frequently. (!!!!????)

OK from what I know, there are two communication pairs in working full-duplex, one from A to B and the other from B to A, and there is nothing else that can share those wires. A NIC can only send out ONE packet at a time so the possibility of a collision is ZERO.

If there is some nonzero possibility of a collision on full duplex, someone please tell us how!! thanks
Mat P

2002-06-19, 2:11 am

I'd agree with you, and Cisco also state the same -
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td...tm#xtocid268258
However (this may be it???) if you have duplex mismatch, i.e. half duplex one end, full duplex on the other, you can still get late collisions -
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/86/10.html
kalejaiye

2002-06-19, 5:25 am

yea,

good job.
marathoner

2002-06-19, 9:36 am

I wouldn't call it full-duplex if a mismatch was configured, but what do I know???

so what happens in that case? (must be the only configuration error I HAVEN'T made hehe) I would think it would just not work at all and counting collisions would be the least of your problems.
darthfeces

2002-06-19, 3:50 pm

there are no collisions in full duplex

collisions that may be seen are a telltale sign
of duplex mismatch.

http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td.../scg/kitrbl.htm
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2009 examnotes.net