|
Home > Archive > Certified Internet Webmaster - CIW > May 2001 > CIW logo
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
|
|
| flygirl 2001-05-27, 5:19 am |
| Well, I have just passed the CIW site designer exam with 90%, but now would like to use the logo. How do I do this. I will be started the E-Commerce class next week and will soon be Webmaster, YIPPIE. But, still want logo for business cards and letterheads. Thanks for any help, Nancy | |
| SasiSan 2001-05-27, 9:16 am |
| FlyGirl -- I am sorry but I can't remember: You passed i-Net+ right? And if so did you submit the form and score sheet to CIW?
I just tried loggin in to the instructor site and after two months they must have shut off the temp login they gave me... without giving me another one! | |
| flygirl 2001-05-27, 9:26 am |
| I have passed the CIW Foundations and now Site designer and yes I have filled out that online stuff. I think I will give them a call. The course work is great but the organization of both them and place I am taking classes, in the UK, leave a lot to be desired!!! The tutors here are FABULOUS and that is their saving grace otherwise the organization is AWEFUL!!! | |
| SasiSan 2001-05-27, 10:46 am |
| I sent them a letter after ScottishFlower's message a while ago. As one of their instructors, asking them for help -- I didn't even receive a reply!!!
You are right about the administration of the program. If they don't fix it soon then this program is going to falter and fail. I tried to go online to get you a logo and I finally found a copy of the Professional one. | |
| flygirl 2001-05-28, 12:11 am |
| Thank you for your effort and the logo. It is a good program, I think, and like I said my instructors have been first rate, but it is just the administration of it, especially when they are asking people to pay. If it were free that would be one thing, but I am paying £2000.00, which is about $3600.00, so I expect better. Thanks again, Nancy |
|
|
|
|