|
Home > Archive > Windows 2000 track general > April 2002 > Windows 2000 Life Cycle
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Windows 2000 Life Cycle
|
|
|
| There's a good article on the Windows 2000 life cycle over at TechRepublic. Here's the link: http://www.techrepublic.com/article...m&fromtm=e103-4
Hopefully it'll get you around the "Register before you can read" thingie. Not that there's anything wrong with that... | |
|
| Interesting !! | |
| cross36 2002-04-25, 7:34 pm |
| Good article, at least they are extending it to the 1st quarter of 2004.
They should hurry and SP1 release for XP, because I am tired of sending many ridiculous error reports to them | |
| eljefe79 2002-04-26, 3:48 pm |
| Yet another reason to base your back-end services on a UNIX platform. Most organizations cannot afford the cost associated with upgrading their core server infrastructure every 4 years. Just imagine a year to observe and evaluate (Shakedown phase), a year to plan and another 6 mos to a year to migrate. How much stability is there? Talking about a profit treadmill. Between their licensing, educational and support practices, they may have shot themselves in the foot. As the article points out, they should rethink their business-line product policies and shoot for stability. |
|
|
|
|