Home > Archive > CCNA > February 2004 > Sybex vs. Cisco: 802.1q





You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread. To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to this thread please [click here]

Author Sybex vs. Cisco: 802.1q
Kitsune

2004-02-25, 7:51 am

Basically, which configuration is "correct" for the exam?
Setting up a trunk on a router:

Sybex says:
Router(config)#interface f0/0
Router(config-if)#no ip address
Router(config-subif)#no shutdown
Router(config-if)#interface f0/0.1
Router(config-subif)#encaps dot1q 1
Router(config-subif)#ip address 10.2.3.4 255.255.255.0
Router(config-subif)#interface f0/0.2
Router(config-subif)#encaps dot1q 2
etc...

Cisco reminds us that 802.1q uses native vlan, so that one doesn't need a sub-interface for the native vlan, so...

Router(config)#interface f0/0
Router(config-if)#ip address 10.2.3.4 255.255.255.0
Router(config-if)#no shutdown
Router(config-if)#interface f0/0.2
Router(config-subif)#encaps dot1q 2
etc...

Refrence: CCNA: ICND (Cisco Press) p291. CCNA Fast Pass (Sybex) p134. CCNA (Sybex) p369-70.
Sponsored Links





Free Braindumps | MCSE braindumps software forum

Copyright 2003 - 2008 examnotes.net