|
|
| benedict 2002-08-08, 6:39 pm |
| First, I configured RIP in RouterA with a Network 192.25.0.0.
sh ip route ouput shows "R" routes
Second I configured igrp with as 100 and network 192.25.0.0
sh ip route output shows "I" routes no more "R" routes
Sh ip protocol output shows that both Rip and Igrp are configured
Question: Why were the "R" routes remove? Shouldn't both "R" and "I" routes remain in the routing table?
Same config done in RouterB. | |
|
| igrp has better AD than rip so its route is injected into the table. | |
| benedict 2002-08-08, 7:54 pm |
| I understand, but why is the "R" route removed?
Do you mean that "R" and "I" routes can not coexist in a routing table? | |
| SureshHomepage 2002-08-08, 10:15 pm |
| A routing table would install a route if it finds it as a cost wise feasible one and has better AD.
In your case the router has got 2 means of reachig your detination network, one through RIP and another through IGRP. It has chosen the route by a routing protocol whose AD is better and in our case it is IGRP. The reason is IGRP is more trustworthy (better AD) than RIP.
Hope this would help you better. | |
| benedict 2002-08-09, 2:01 am |
| Sorry for being stubborn.
But isnt 4 the default number of ip routes, to the same subnet, a router can keep and that the maximum is 6?
Shouldnt the router kept the "R" routes too because of the above concept?
 | |
|
|
| makyol46 2002-08-09, 6:33 am |
| I think if you change routing protocol. youe configration table also changed and last routing protocol is seen your configration protocols .. do you think where is find routersimulation | |
| benedict 2002-08-09, 4:52 pm |
| Thanks Everyone and to Mikop and SureshHomepage. |
|
|
|