|
|
| strong 2002-03-28, 9:23 am |
| i will do the exam soon i have notes about the 640-507 exame is it the smae thing as the 640-607 or it need deffirinet book
i am reding the study guide for todd lammle
is it good i am in chapter 9 did any one use some thing like cheat_sheets if any one use it can you give it for me | |
| haseeb_eng 2002-03-29, 11:23 am |
| I don't understand one thing that when any exam number changes why everybody get upset ? If it has same course outline then nothing to worry about it . | |
| strikeattack 2002-03-29, 12:41 pm |
| quote:
I don't understand one thing that when any exam number changes why everybody get upset ? If it has same course outline then nothing to worry about it .
Probably because, historically speaking, a number change has been combined with new material. | |
|
| quote:
Originally posted by strikeattack
Probably because, historically speaking, a number change has been combined with new material.
LOL 
There you have it! | |
| haseeb_eng 2002-03-29, 2:13 pm |
| But cisco had mentioned allready that syllabus is same . SO why they have ot worry about ? | |
| chodan 2002-03-29, 2:33 pm |
| human nature I guess.
I mean when I did CID they changed the objectives on me.
They actually removed some objectives, did that make me feel better?
No
It made me even more nervous hehe
Why?
I don`t know 
Just human nature 
We like to worry I guess | |
| frank300zx 2002-03-29, 6:07 pm |
| If you were lucky to have taken the other previous exams, basically you could have passed it by just reading the dumps and all you had to know was basic routing commands. Now imagine the new test which actually tests your knowledge through the simulation exam and yet the value of your CCNA is same as the one's who took the exam last year or last month. I can tell you that I know atleast 3 CCNA's who can't even configure a port or even better seen a real router. So If Cisco forces them to recertify..then it would be a fair exam...like what Microsoft did with 2000 Track vs the NT4.0. Granted the objectives is the same, but its like saying its a 5 mile marathon and instead of running only, you have to jump the hurdle and swim for two miles to get to the finish line. For me it doesn't matter, because I am looking beyond CCNA and toward CCNP so I got to know my stuff. | |
| chodan 2002-03-29, 8:25 pm |
| quote:
Originally posted by frank300zx
If you were lucky to have taken the other previous exams, basically you could have passed it by just reading the dumps and all you had to know was basic routing commands. Now imagine the new test which actually tests your knowledge through the simulation exam and yet the value of your CCNA is same as the one's who took the exam last year or last month. I can tell you that I know atleast 3 CCNA's who can't even configure a port or even better seen a real router. So If Cisco forces them to recertify..then it would be a fair exam...like what Microsoft did with 2000 Track vs the NT4.0. Granted the objectives is the same, but its like saying its a 5 mile marathon and instead of running only, you have to jump the hurdle and swim for two miles to get to the finish line. For me it doesn't matter, because I am looking beyond CCNA and toward CCNP so I got to know my stuff.
Cisco has always required recertification.
I recomend recertifying by going foward to the CCNP which will automatically recertify you. |
|
|
|