|
Home > Archive > i-NET+ > June 2000 > Subnet mask question
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Subnet mask question
|
|
|
| The following test question appears in the "i-Net+ for Dummies" final exam section. I thought I new enough about subnet masks to answer the question but perhaps not. Either that or there is a typo in the answer section of the exam. I would like your input.
The question is:
Which of the following is most likely the subnet mask for 204.200.106.1?
The available answers are:
a) 255.0.0.0
b) 255.255.0.0
c) 255.255.255.1
d) 255.255.255.255
The answer key states:
D. 204.200.106.1 is obviously a Class C address, right? That means you would most likely use the default standard subnet mask for class C addresses.
I chose answer C.
Maybe I slept through an important part of subnet masks, so any help with this question would be appreciated.
Thanks!
------------------
Rick | |
|
| Hmmm, "none of the above" wasn't a choice, huh? 255.255.255.000 is the default for a Class C address; 255.255.255.1 would be a router address.
I'm voting for 2 typos in the question. | |
|
| Typo in the book!!!
The correct subnet mask should be 255.255.255.0. It is Class C which reserves the first 24 bits. It is completely illegal to end a subnet in a .1. Subnets can only be: 128, 192, 224, 240, 248, 252 and 255
Hope this helps!
------------------
San...
MCSE, MCDBA, MCT, i-Net+ | |
|
| Thanks for the input. I had a sneaking suspicion that the error was typographical. The "i-Net+ Certification for Dummies" is a great reference but lacks some depth in many areas. All in all, this book together with the dumps available, plus Augie's flash cards (Thanks again Augie!)I think do a pretty good job. I will confirm this in a couple of weeks.
| |
|
| Rick, good luck on your test! You are already following my #1 piece of advice -- Question everything! Don't just memorize the answers but make sure you understand the answer. Practically every source I used had at least one mistake.
AuroraB
i-Net+, CIW wannabe
|
|
|
|
|