|
Home > Archive > 70-068 enterprise > November 2000 > Weird lan Question-Help
You are viewing an archived Text-only version of the thread.
To view this thread in it's original format and/or if you want to reply to
this thread please [click here]
| Author |
Weird lan Question-Help
|
|
|
| I can't make sure the below. would you pls verify them?
77. Three domains : HQ, D1 and D2. You set it up this way : All user accounts will be in HQ. D1 and D2 trust HQ. Create a computer account for all users in D1 and D2. Assign Domain\Users global group in HQ domain permissions to a printer in D1. Assign Domain\Users global group in HQ permissions to a shared folder in D2. Which of the following will be true of your set-up?
A. Users can use a single account to access the whole domain
B. Any user can join D1 or D2 domain
C. Users in HQ can access printer in D1
D. Users in HQ can access share in D2
Answer A
I think that A,B,C,D are right.
81. You are responsible for managing the SALES domain of a single domain network spanning two cities, Mexico City and London. In each city are 50 client workstations. Mexico City has one NT Server configured as a Primary Domain Controller and running DHCP and WINS server services. London also has an NT server which is configured only as a member server providing file and print services. Your users in London complain of slow logon attempts and client bootup times. Browsing through Network Neighborhood has also become unacceptably slow. Users in Mexico City though are not reporting any problems with network performance.
Required Result: Improve the performance of the client computers in London to the same level as those in Mexico City.
Optional desired result:
Reduce WINS traffic over the 56 KBPS link. Reduce DHCP traffic over the 56 KBPS link.
Maintain the same level of name resolution service while minimizing replication traffic over the 56 KBPS link.
Reduce logon validation traffic over the 56 KBPS link.
Proposed solution :
Reinstall Windows NT Server and set-up as a BDC. Add WINS and DHCP to the Windows NT Server in London.
Configure all computers in London to use local WINS server.
Configure the replication governor on the registry to 25%.
Configure the two WINS servers as pull partners only.
Which result did the proposed solution produce?
A. The proposed solution produces the required result produces all the optional desired results.
B. The proposed solution produces the required result produces 2 of the optional desired results.
C. The proposed solution produces the required result produces but neither of the optional desired results.
D. The proposed solution does not produce the required result.
Answer B according to Petri all desired results are NOTmet. Adjusting the replication governor will not help in this instance. From Ian: Answer A (No push partner for WINS) From El Loco: I kinda think that it's A I don't think you need WINS to be Push partners to satisfy the optional result ..I think Pull partners is good enough for name resolution also they will not "push" information to each other which kind of satisfy the requirement not to increase the network trafic but to profide name resolution. Push partners are needed for fault tolerance but this is not the case here??? So I'll let you decide. – (El Loco)
I think that A is better choice
93. The directory service architecture of the trust relationship and placement of domain controllers for the Windows NT server network as shown in exhibit.
Caracas <--------------Chicago-------------------Paris
__________________ | | | _______________
\/.............................| \/
Seattle Dallas New York
Required Results:
Network lines may not be saturated with logon validations
Users from Caracas and Paris domains must access resources on Chicago domain.
Users from Chicago must access resources on Seattle, Dallas & New York.
Optional Results:
Centralized user management.
Administrators on resource domains must be able to manage access to their own resources but not those of the other cities.
Proposed Solution:
Use Single Master domain model
Set up one way trusts so that Chicago is the trusted domain
Place the PDC and the BDC in Chicago and a BDC for Chicago in each city
Manage network from Chicago
Which result does the proposed solution produce?
A. The proposed solution produces the required results and produces both of the optional desired results.
B. The proposed solution produces the required results and produces only 1 of the optional desired results.
C. The proposed solution produces the required results but does not produce either of the optional results.
D. The proposed solution does not produce the required results
Answer D (Users from Caracas and Paris domains cannot access resources on Chicago domain. All users are not in the trusted Chicago domain)
I think that it is A
96. The directory service architecture of the trust relationship and placement of domain controllers for the Windows NT server network as shown in exhibit.
Caracas ----------------Chicago-----------------------Paris
__________________ | | | _______________
\/..........................................| \/
Seattle Dallas New York
Required Results:
Network lines may not be saturated with logon validations
Users from Caracas and Paris domains must access resources on Chicago domain.
Users from Chicago must access resources on Seattle, Dallas & New York.
Optional Results:
Centralized user management.
Administrators on resource domains must be able to manage access to their own resources but not those of the other cities.
Proposed Solution:
Use the single master domain model
Place user accounts in the Chicago domain. Configure all other locations as resource domains. Configure Chicago as a trusted domain and all other cities as the trusting domains.
Place the PDC and the BDC for Chicago domain in Chicago and place at least 1 BDC for the Chicago in each other cities.
Which result does the proposed solution produce?
A. The proposed solution produces the required results and produces both of the optional desired results.
B. The proposed solution produces the required results and produces only 1 of the optional desired results.
C. The proposed solution produces the required results but does not produces either the optional results.
D. The proposed solution does not produce the required results.
Answer: D
I think that it is A
59. NT Server attached to Ethernet and Token ring network. Client computers on two networks are NT Workstation. Use NWLink IPX/SPX only. We want NT Server to act as an IPX router between the two networks. All clients need access to shared resources on both networks in network neighbourhood.
A. Install SAP agent. Configure internal network number for each network.
B. Install SAP agent. Install RIP for NWLink IPX/SPX compatible protocol.
C. Install RIP for NWLink IPX/SPX compatible protocol. Install file and print services for Netware.
D. Install RIP for NWLink IPX/SPX compatible protocol. Enable NetBIOS broadcast propagation.
Answer B ( answer D? - When you install RIP for NWLink the SAP agent is installed automatically. If you disable NetBIOS broadcast propagation and IPX is the only protocol installed. On this server and on clients connected to this server, then clients will not be able to communicate with servers on other networks. So you must enable NetBIOS broadcast propagation to "access shared resources on both networks"- Ian)
| |
|
| I'm not really going to say the exact answer, because I'm not sure my self and wouldn't want to confuse you, but I just wanted to say that 77 I've seen on my test on Friday. Which is a good thing, to bad I didn't use Ian's dumps before the test, well know I'm using them, Have to pass this freaking test, to move on.
-Yan | |
|
| for Q's 93-96, see postings further up the list. rprin & kid goffy have relevant info...
As for 81. Ian is correct. according to my MS offical text, in general:
Push locally, pull remotely BUT
if you have 2 wins servers that need to replicate with each other BOTH need tpo be push AND pull partners.
In this case, eash WINS server has a database with segment specific resources that must replicate with each other. Thus, you casn not maintain the same level of name resolution w/o a pull partnership set up between them. Each is both a Push & a Pull partner for each other.
As for 77:
The 'create a computer acct for all users' here is misleading. It means oyu have users that use comuters that are members of D1 & D2. It this case, these users User Acounts live in HQ. This points to pass-though authentification of users who log in from comoputers in the D1 & D2 domains to User Accounts in the HQ domain.
ALL users in this example are HQ Domain Users ( HQ\username ). thus if you assign Domain\Domain Users in HQ to D1 & D2, they cross the trust as HQ\Domain Users.
Specificly:
A: Technically, only HQ\Users can use a single acct to access the whole domin. Any random user accounts in D1 or D2 can only access D1 or D2 resouces as this is a Single Master Domain model where HQ is the Trusted Domain.
B: Users do not 'Join' domains. They log into them. They have accounts created by Admins for them. Only computers join domians.
C: Yes*
D: C*
*According to my text from MS official curriculm, "A Global group can be put into local groups OR be given permissions & rights directly in other domains
(obviosly this direct assignment of permissions to GG's violates the MS prefered 'AGLP' method)
I would answer C & D but you should research this for yourself as I make no claims to perfection <:
This question is closely related to the trust questions you ask about (91-98 or something like this)
Hope this helps
------------------
Know why the other
answers are wrong
[This message has been edited by cltrin (edited 11-16-2000).] |
|
|
|
|