| Author |
Question on a Transcender Question
|
|
|
| Test B Question 19-
Your company is based in Nashville with branch offices in NY,LA,DAL,&ATL. Each office has 200 users. Each are shown connected to NASH by a 56kbps frame relay links.
Required:
Users from NASH must be able to access resourses in DAL & ATL
Users from LA $ NY must be able to access resources in NASH
Logon Validation over the WAN must be minimized
Optional:
You want centralized administration of user accts.
Each branch office want to manage thier own resources.
Proposed solution:
Implement the single master domain model. Configure NASH to be the master domain and all branch offices to be resource domains trusting NASH. Place at least on BDC from NASH in each branch office. Manage all user accts from NASH.
Now, they say this meets all requirements but I don't see how LA and NY can access NASH with out NASH trusting them. Am I missing something here?? | |
|
| Ok, I'll try...
The text book definition of single master domain says you have central administration of user accounts and decentralized administration of resources.
The master domain acts as the central administrative unit for users and group accounts. All other domains on the network trust this domain, which means they recognize the users and global groups defined there. (This is where other domains can share each others resources) The master domain is the trusted domain. The others are trusting domains. Because of this trust, users in the master domain have access to resources in trusting domains. I would have felt better about the question if it had something about puting the users in global groups then assigning them to local groups in the domain they need resource access. See NT in Enterprise for Dummies for more.
BTW, I didn't see these same questions from Transcenders on the exam. Troy Tech study guide was closer to the real questions.
Aim High!
FreddyFlyer | |
|
| Where can i get a copy of the Troy Tech Study guide.
Your assistance is most appreciated
Beboy,
MCP X2, MOUS | |
|
| First off good luck on your exam Analogkid, I will be sitting the site exam in a few weeks Server is 19th of this month..............
Hey beboy check out the url address here and see if that takes you to Troytec site........see ya...........
http://www.troytec.com/ | |
|
| to answer your question, since no one really did... you are right. your practive test is WRONG. you need to have a 2 way trust on the LA & NY to NASH domains. it hits all required AND optional EXCEPT LA & NY accessing resources in NASH.
there's a question that's nearly identical in ExamEssentials and it states the proposed solution fits NONE. (it also leaves out the BDCs though...)
------------------
brent.barton
www.LANheroes.com
| |
|
| Sorry, have to disagree with Chunder. The answer to the question is correct.
The single-master domain model provides central administration of users together with logical grouping of department resources. The department-level domains (the one with the resources) trust the master domain. All user accounts for the entire network (read all locations), as well as all global groups are created at and maintained at the master domain level. The department-level domains has its own local groups. The master domain's primary function in life is to centrally manage the user accounts. That's why it is import to have a BDC at each location to speed up access at the local level. Each of the other domains function primarily as resource domains and don't manage own user accounts for their domains. The resources in the department-level domains are available to the entire network. Two way trusts are used in the Multiple-master domain model where each master trusts all the other master domains.
Advantage of a Single-Master Domain Model
1. Central management of user accounts.
2. Necessary to define global groups only once.
3.Department-level administration of resources.
4. Only one trust relationship necessary for each secondary domain.
Disadvantage of a Single-Master Domain Model
1. Performance degradation as number of users and groups grow.
2. Central Point fo failure (PDC)
3. Necessary to define local groups for each secondary domain.
Aim High!
FreddyFlyer | |
|
| FreddyFlyer... nice work. these domains still mess me up a bit. the fact that ALL the user accounts DO reside in the NASH (master) domain and NOT at each location (resource domain) is where i get thrown off. thanks for helping to clear that up. HOWEVER, if for some wacky-*** reason there WERE users in the resource domains... then what i said about the 2-way would be right... lol.
------------------
brent.barton
www.LANheroes.com
|
|
|
|